The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honeymoon Disease[edit]

Honeymoon Disease (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like this page was generated by a fan with a promotional slant-- the references consist of several links to the band's own website, an interview by someone named "Electronic Brain", and three reviews of their first two albums. The reviews might be legit... for articles on the albums. Do they pass WP:MUSIC? Bindle-stiff (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.The only stuff I could find per Google is their own promotional efforts. Existence does not equal notability. No significant independent coverage. The reviews cited are not legit for notability purposed. The are from poor sources, consisting of user submitted content or small time. Specifically:

  • Danagerdog Music reviews is just the website of one guy who reviews the music he likes; on the site he solicits submissions. ShelbyMarion (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.