The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel St. Pierre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hotel / building(s). This was orginally deleted (twice) via copyvio. The copyvio issue has been cleared via OTRS, but the article is essentially unreferenced (only reference is to the jazz club). Only claim of significance is National Register of Historic Places, but NPS.gov search returns nothing. NPS email reply confirms that the building is only included in National Register because of its physical location within a historic area. Zero secondary coverage to establish notability. 7 00:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can find coverage of the hotel in older newspapers [1] and a few books: [2], [3] and [4]. Let's give this one a chance to be saved. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - if kept, it will have to be renamed as there is more than one "Hotel St Pierre". As St. is short fort "saint", you can find more of them.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 16:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but only because of Regent's findings: nothing else is appearing that I can find. It's a contributing property to the National Register-listed Vieux Carre Historic District, but neither the form used to nominate the district to the Register nor the form used to nominate the district for National Historic Landmark status say anything about this hotel. Nyttend (talk) 07:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.