The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Roberts (talent scout)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article of a person that fails WP:NOTABILITY. A quick google search yields mainly wikipedia mirrors of the article; only source provided is an extremely short 3 paragraph obituary. Ljgua124 (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 06:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 06:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 06:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- COPYVIO. The article seems to be a word-for-word copy of the BBC website article. And I doubt that football talent scouts are really notable, even if serving a club as notable as Manchester United. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I performed some minor edits to the article to address close paraphrasing. See the Earwig's Copyvio Detector result here for the present state of the article relative to the source presently used in it. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Scouts are only notable in extraordinary circumstances and this is not demonstrated here at all. Google also yields precious little. Spiderone 21:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.