The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild 13:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IAENG[edit]

IAENG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Looks like a directory. Hammer1980·^talk 17:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is nothing but a list of members of a non-notable organization. If anyone on that list is notable, then an article should be written about that person, and maybe the list can become a category, but for the time being this does not seem possible nor useful. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 17:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since the article is not an article. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunnyao (talk) 18:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the comments. The contents have been enriched with the publication of the organization, as well as the main societies that the organization consists of. The list of the co-chairs of the organization has also been removed as suggested.[reply]

• Delete Not an encyclopedia article but a collection of trivial information Rackabello (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunnyao (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Thanks again for the suggestion. For the content, different wiki articles have been visited and their styles and contents has been studied as reference sites. As a result, the content has been enriched in such a way that it is of the same content level as the other encyclopedia articles of organizations in wiki.[reply]

• Delete unless there is some evidence for real world notability. It publishes journals, but I cannot find them listed in worldCat. It held 2 conferences, but the proceedings, according to WorldCat, [1] are each of them held only in two libraries. this is not yet a notable organisation. Our purpose is not to provide PR to help them get started . DGG (talk) 02:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunnyao 15:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Thanks for your information about the WorldCat. But, besides WorldCat, there are other more traditional academics databases like IET INSPEC, EBSCO, ISI Thomson Scientific, CSA (Cambridge Scientific Abstracts), etc. They have been indexing the journals and conference proceedings books. As these databases may be only available to the subsripted universities, for convenience, this indexing information can be found at: http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2008/doc/INSPEC.txt http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2008/doc/EBSCO.pdf http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2008/doc/ISI.pdf http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2008/csa.html[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.