The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 04:49, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMAGINiT[edit]

IMAGINiT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable division of a larger company that has no Wikipedia article (note that RAND is a different, unrelated company). Tagged as questionable notability since March of 2008, has no third-party references, and a google search provided only this potential third-party, reliable source within the first three pages. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 17:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This business is a global reseller and integrator of the Autodesk line of products. In other words, they sell and install products they did not create. It seems to me it would be a hard sell for such a business to get "long term historical notability", and I don't see anything that makes the grade. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.