The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Knew Them[edit]

I Knew Them (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like an advertisement of an unknown band. Should be deleted. Glucken123 (talk) 15:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Glucken123 (talk) 15:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural Keep - No evidence that WP:BEFORE was followed and good evidence that it probably wasn't as this was part of a mass-nomination of dozens of articles about Greek culture over the course of a hour. These articles may well include articles failing WP:GNG (I suspect this one does - probably if you nominated 20+ articles at random you would find some that do) but the nom hasn't even done the basic work of determining whether they are or aren't. FOARP (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• One monthly listener on Spotify, zero sources that show notability and limited online presence. May I ask you to have a good look at your contributions to my deletion nominations - please? Glucken123 (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Spotify stats are *NOT* relevant for WP:AFD. Follow WP:BEFORE when nominating articles for deletion, especially the bit about finding alternatives to deletion. FOARP (talk) 16:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• No notable record label releases, no reliable sources or international press, an extremely limited presence on the web since the day they were found, and a sh*tload of claims that cannot be backed. Even their discography on Discogs is incomplete without any notable information or something significant. I agree on Spotify, but come on - google is your friend, and in this case there isn't much to be said about a band that has no notability. Glucken123 (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article includes a number of sources giving coverage to the band that need to be assessed properly. What is the nature of the Mic.gr review? Does Mic.gr have an editorial team (and hence, is it likely a WP:NEWSORG)? Same question goes for the Slovenia News/Si21 source. This is why WP:BEFORE is so important. FOARP (talk) 10:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mic.gr published a live review, where I KNEW THEM supported the main act. There is only one paragraph about their performance, that's all. Glucken123 (talk) 11:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FOARP: There are no real sources. The so-called "References" are listings, at best. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 12:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not sources available to support notability. No sources available to verify the article content. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 12:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable, missing WP:RS. --Micky (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not one fact in the article is specifically cited to any source. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.