The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Icelandic New Zealanders[edit]

Icelandic New Zealanders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only WP:ROUTINE coverage, with nothing of any particular notability here. TheMagikCow (talk) 08:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm working on the article. It might take a while due to other commitments but I will be expanding the article. Dash9Z (talk) 09:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment May I suggest the article be redirected to European New Zealanders? I haven't had much time to work on the article and redirecting while I work on it won't delete the edit history. Dash9Z (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete 120 people in a population of 4.7 million is hardly noteworthy. is there evidence these people together meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - there is a series of these articles, such as Finnish New Zealanders, and they should all be considered for deletion or a merger. Mattlore (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - combining two random attributes does not make for notability.Glendoremus (talk) 05:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all - I agree with Cordless Larry - all of these articles fail WP:GNG and should be deleted. DrStrauss talk 10:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Russian, Italian, German, Danish and Swedish -New Zealanders all have their own individual AfD pages for the same reason. DrStrauss talk 16:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. they are all bigger communities. LibStar (talk) 10:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no coverage from reliable sources Spiderone 11:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete Redirect and merge into Scandinavian New Zealanders – Far off from meeting GNG. J947 04:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not significant enough to pass WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.