The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected without opposition.  Sandstein  18:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imeet fred[edit]

Imeet fred (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete and move information, if verified, to list of iCarly episodes; non-notable unaired episode. No episode in the series has its own article. Synchronism (talk) 21:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Merge - the nominator pretty much says it all here. Not much more to say _David^WS _(contribs) 22:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• NOTE: If information is merged, attribution needs to be retained, which is easiest to do if the article is redirected instead of deleted Otherwise you get complicated edit summaries that get lost. - Mgm|^(talk) 00:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Um, there is no 'attribution' or any relevant or notable content, the writer is listed as TBA. The only information to be verified is that this Fred character is going to be on this show at some point, which might be a fabrication; it is likely unattributable.Synchronism (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I guess I'll just redirect it, it's much more simple, and will assist recreation later.Synchronism (talk) 22:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.