The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Discussion closed because article has been speedily deleted. Peridon (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imsogb[edit]

Imsogb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page lacks WP:NOTE. It reads like an advertisement. It is only 2 sentences long. Suggesting Delete due to any real substance. Maybe in the time it takes to come to a consensus the author can shore it up. Golgofrinchian (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without prejudice and willing to change if sufficient improvement arrives. Peridon (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to the lack of any coverage in third party sources. Pburka (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No notability--Shrike (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.