The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete -- Y not? 15:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No content other than the opening sentence - No content. Links to Russian wiki where there are lists of players - can't check for copyvio of that unfortunately. Antiqueight ^confer 20:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Makes a strong case for qualifying as CSD A3, having no content other than bare external links and a restatement of the title (possibly also A1, frankly). Regardless of whether it would be a valid speedy, I cannot imagine any content that could result in a valid article at this title. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 21:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inherently subjective list. Nwlaw63 (talk) 01:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't a list, it's an article about a list. Whether it's notable or not, in its current state (insufficient context, no references) it isn't ready for the article namespace. Peter James (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not appear to be notable. Giant Snowman 14:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No indication of notability. Fenix down (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.