The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, actually the content was removed due to copyright infringement so G12 applys. --JForget 23:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusionality[edit]

Inclusionality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested PROD. The entire article is based on a single primary source and has been tagged for OR since May. PROD contested once before (see talk page) but with no change made to improve verifiability. Googling gives no new secondary and verifiable sources. Prashanthns (talk) 03:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. Lots of jargon, no real assertion of notability. RayAYang (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--  Darth Mike  _{(Talk • Contribs)} 05:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Copyright infringement. Article has been tagged accordingly. =Axlq 06:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.