The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ines Temple[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:BIO JMHamo (talk) 21:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. for (;;) (talk) 16:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PERNOM. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nom did not do WP:BEFORE. There are plenty of sources about Temple. I've added several to the article. These include both sources in Spanish and English. Anyone more fluent in Spanish than me can probably find a ton more in Spanish. Subject of the article passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - We need multiple sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail. Not passing mentions, or any old site that happens to have the topic's name in it, and certainly not Blogs. JMHamo (talk) 22:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Blogs from established news sources, like El Comercio (Peru) are reliable sources. She is written up fully, with a very in-depth profile in La Republica. Her book, as you can see if you look in the article itself, is a best-seller in Peru. These are all good for establishing notability. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, with kudos to User:Megalibrarygirl for her WP:HEY.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 01:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a leader in her field and a best-selling author. MurielMary (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.