The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 14:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infosurv[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company (article created by recently blocked sock/meat farm, likely a PR company, that have been using WP for promotional purposes) EyeSerene^talk 14:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.

Delete. Another non-notable online market research firm advertising on Wikipedia. The references that aren't to routine listings like Better Business Bureau or Inc 5000 lists are to stories on trade related websites that refer to surveys they made, which does not constitute significant coverage of the business itself. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. wp:notability is unclear. But there's no content to be lost; the content is essentially a promo piece for the company and their products. North8000 (talk) 16:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There isn't enough notability aside from this one mention here. I didn't see any other notable sources on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 21:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.