The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF. The short non-dicdef paragraph about legal restrictions is general to the point of uselessness, and unverifiable - it is sourced to a primary source, one US law against the misuse of US federal insignia, which does not support the content. Sandstein 22:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 23:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 23:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There's a perfectly good page at Wiktionary.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 02:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move Insignia (disambiguation) over this It's a dicdef and duplicative. Nate • (chatter) 02:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as duplicate. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A Wikipedia article could be developed on the topic (history, current, etc.) - at present this is a WP:DICTDEF fail.Icewhiz (talk) 06:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:DICTDEF. Kierzek (talk) 18:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.