The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Institute for Consciousness Research[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Not a notable organization. What's worse, there appears to be two different but separate organizations! One based in Oklahoma and one based in ~~India~~ Canada. jps (talk) 00:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. Subject fails GNG and ORG. Sources fail RS. Google yielded nothing that rings the N Bell. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:45, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - thoroughly nonnnotable. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - No evidence of any notability, –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I did find where the ICR is mentioned in this book, but this isn't enough to show notability to the point where we'd keep the article. There are other sources, but they'd be considered WP:SPS and/or too WP:FRINGE for Wikipedia to consider them usable as a RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per above, and because half the article's refs are taken from the ICR's own publications. --Seduisant (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lack of sufficient coverage in relaible independent secondary sources. Fails all notability guidelines. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 02:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence of notability in reliable sources. - - MrBill3 (talk) 08:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable self-promotional spam, Second Quantization (talk) 22:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.