The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Policy Studies (New Zealand)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Tagged for possible lack of notability since April 2012. There appear to be no online sources other than the institute's website and this Wikipedia article. Akld guy (talk) 08:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is linked at three other articles: Think tank, where it is linked in a simple list (no ref), New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme with a 2008 context and linkrotted ref, and at Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading) Amendment Act 2008 with a valid 2008 ref. Seems to have not been in the news for at least 10 years, despite maintaining a current website. Akld guy (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 March 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that they are probably not notable, but there are lots of mentions on line. I will not be surprised if someone finds something solid, but I can't. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 09:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)).[reply]
Delete. as per Akld guy and Dushan Jugum. This lacks notability and 3 duplicated articles which has some similarity anyway. Sheldybett (talk) 12:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.