The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 22:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

InsurgentSort[edit]

InsurgentSort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Not a widely recognized (or performant) sort algorithm; clearly intended as a joke. Milyle 22:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep –– 30sman 21:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

— 30sman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete per nom. A non-notable or non-existent joke, as a Google search shows. Pan Dan 21:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know of two commercial products that utilize this algorithm.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.