The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 10:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Coal Ventures Private Limited[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the article, it seems they have not yet actually done anything. DGG ( talk ) 05:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does it matter that organisation should have reaped some business objectives so that it can be part of wiki .. I don't think so. Gaurav Pruthi^talk 08:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 10:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 10:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It makes it very hard for the organisation to have any in depth coverage. There are a few press releases - but I see nothing in depth. Merely standard announcements, nothing to pass wp:CORP Neonchameleon (talk) 20:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No solid reliable coverage from completely independent sources. Nyttend (talk) 21:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also think I wont be able to update the article till the time organisation comes into picture somehow because of its operations Gaurav Pruthi^talk 04:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.