The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies per Coolabahapple's reasoning. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ione Taylor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She has had an accomplished career and won several awards, but this article simply repeats her personal CV and LinkedIn profile, and violates WP:NOTRESUME. Her awards are from industry groups with no outside media coverage, and all that can be found are WP:ROUTINE industry directory listings. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks notability and reads like a CV not an encyclopedia article and is there for a form of promotionalism. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Parts are copyvio, and the rest is boilerplate that makes no real claims of significance. XOR'easter (talk) 02:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, non-encyclopedic and looks like a resume. Highway 89 (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I see that this article has been created by a brand new student editor (hi Briannaerika) for a geology unit, so this may explain why it "violates WP:NOTRESUME", "reads like a CV", and "Parts are copyvio"; also that the nominator acknowledges that Taylor "has had an accomplished career and won several awards", so with appropriate sources found she might meet WP:GNG; i suggest draftify so that the creator has the opportunity to work on it. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.