The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ipsito Das

[edit]

Considering subject to be WP:REVDEL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

10:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Further Verified Notability and Contribution to the Bengali SocietyWP:ARTIST also falls under WP:ANYBIO as publisher of India's Bengali fashion magazine. http://www.myfashion19.com/ipsito-das-fashion-photographers-terns-magazine-publisher/

10:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC) 10:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Notable Photographer-"Awarded by Netherland Effie. Information found in WP:NEWSORG website as WP:CREATIVE photographer.

ref http://www.ftkindia.com/indian-fashion-photographer-ipsito-das-awarded-by-effie-netherland/ 10:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Poorly referenced BLP of a non-notable photographer. I was unable to find any reliable sources with which to establish that the subject is notable per WP:BIO. - Mr X 09:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Freelance photographer with a 2 year career behind him. Only the unreferenced claim to have "Introduced new techniques in photography" stops this being a CSD A7, but unless evidence to verify that can be produced the subject fails WP:CREATIVE. AllyD (talk) 09:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable photographer, obviously fails WP:GNG. hmssolent\^{Let's convene} _{My patrols} 10:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "Introduced new techniques in photography" - yeah, right, Santa Claus exists! Non-notable amateur photographer, that claims himself to be a genius - that what he really is, judging by all the information there is on him on the internet. Olderon (talk) 23:13, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.