The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Islington Corinthians F.C.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SPA creator has the same name as the writer of the main source for the article, Rob Cavallini. I'm only not prodding this because it does sound like an interesting story, but I don't think WP:Notability (sports), WP:ORG or WP:GNG are met. No good redirect or merge target available. Boleyn (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - seems like there is a reasonable amount out there aside from the book reviewed here by WSC. I can also find:

This london newspaper article,
This Reading newspaper article (subscription required),
This newspaper report from Singapore
This press release about an exhibition organised by the National Football Museum and the Qatar Olympic Museum which features exhibits from their world tour.

Their tour was back in the 1930s, so it is not surprising that there is a lack of online material but, the fact that there is a book published that is dedicated to them aside, the links above show that the team attracted newspaper coverage outside of the UK at the time of the tour at a national level and also continue to receive a degree of coverage today. Additionally the possession of articles relating to the tour by the national football museum also adds weight to the idea that this is an odd but nonetheless notable team. Fenix down (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve, based on Fenix down's research appears to meet WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 19:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Mr. down. 15:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Nomination withdrawn' Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.