The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. While there are concerns being voiced about whether the sources located bestow WP:N, I do not see a consensus to delete the article. Joyous! | Talk 01:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ixigo[edit]

Ixigo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website without a single reliable source giving in-depth coverage of them. Links to their website have been actively spammed here for a long time by throw-away IPs on a considerable number of articles, and it was when doing an external link search (looking for more spam links) that I found the article. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 19:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep While external links to the site should be removed, the company seems quite notable. Clicking on that news links provides a few dozen newsworthy articles about them. I'm not from India but my guess is they are quite a big thing over there. Note there is quite a bit more history for that page here, a history merge might be appropriate. --Muhandes (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable website Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment-Yeah,there are advertisements of the company in Indian TV channels. Also,it's a popular travel website.But does that make it encycloepadic?Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 16:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as corporate spam on an unremarkable travel web site. No value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I see coverage for this company in reliable sources including but not limited to [1], [2], [3]. Meets the notability criteria. Regards—UY Scuti ^Talk 14:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per the reliable sources identified above in the previous post which amount to sig cov in at least two with the other one probable but behind a paywall which lead to a pass of WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 19:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment -- one of the said "sig coverage" is

• "ixigo plans to go for a third round of funding"

This is WP:MILL coverage related to funding and company aspirations. The other one is

• "ixigo launches app discovery platform for train travellers"

-- also routine launch publicity. I don't see sources here that address the topic directly and in detail that are not PR driven. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.