The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J*Davey[edit]

J*Davey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No reliable third party sources here or on the article's talk page, fails Wikipedia:Music. Previously speedy deleted and prodded. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-06t16:50z 16:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep Did you even see the talk page or do a search about the band? If you did you would clearly see there are reliable third party sources and does not fail Wikipedia:Music, whatsoever.--Sugarcubez (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • An press kit on a primary source website isn't a reliable published third party source. Myspace is nothing near an RS. A Google search is not a RS. See wp:rs.
  • wp:v: "Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed. Wikipedia:Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's core content policies." Challenges: speedy, prod, and Afd. Sources need to be inline in the article. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-07t13:42z, -- Jeandré, 2008-09-07t13:46z

Dear, if the press kit sources relaible sources, that is what you should focus on not the press kit itself.--Sugarcubez (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, you should use those reliable sources and reference them in the article. You can also use it to find online versions such as [1]. Don't expect others to do things you don't. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep [2] [3] Duffbeerforme (talk) 09:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The NYT link gives an error. I'm not sure if Metromix is a reliable source, seems like a local gig guide me. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-07t13:42z
    • some more [4] [5] Duffbeerforme (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • That xlr8r ref looks good. If it's used as a ref in the actual article, and the closing admin knows it to be an wp:rs, the article could then satisfy wp:music. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-08t12:20z

Then the descion is to keep now?--Sugarcubez (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I have updated the article. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.