The result was delete. The sole 'keep's argument that other articles would need to be deleted is not strictly relevant to this discussion. The consensus is clearly that the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources means that this article should be deleted PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Over a year, and still no secondary sources, still no assertion of notability. I could not locate any significant coverage of this emulator in books or magazines. There are a number of web hits, but no secondary reporting from reliable publications. WP:V, WP:N Marasmusine (talk) 10:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]