The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 23:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Dunn (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested for no reason. Reason for PROD was that this played failed WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. As of now that still stands to be the case. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 10:36, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nomination. Subject has never played in a fully professional league so fails WP:NFOOTBALL; no significant media coverage so fails WP:GNG. Clicriffhard (talk) 03:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means the subject fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per WP:ATD, this article could easily be expanded with citations so that it meets WP:GNG. Here's a few to get started: 1, 2, 3, 4 5 Hmlarson (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Hmlarson comeon, you may think expanding the article with citations to meet WP:GNG is a piece of cake but it's not. He hasn't received any significant coverage or played in a fully pro league match, so it fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. – Michael (talk) 01:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.