The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Gunter[edit]

Jack Gunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an artist that doesn't meet WP:NARTISTS or WP:SIGCOV at most. Jamiebuba (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Being featured at a tulip festival is hardly wiki-worthy. Zero hits on this person, lots of hits on anyone with his name. Oaktree b (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Page doesn't qualify for wiki. It reads like a resume or self-promotion. Wikipedia Community (talk) 01:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC) Striking sock vote. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let me state for the record that I have no WP:COI relationship with the subject. I only admire his art.
The article is currently a newly created stub. Help appreciated on improving the article. PK-WIKI (talk) 03:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable northwest artist; citations show significant coverage in major reliable sources. PK-WIKI (talk) 17:14, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I added some information from the Washington State Arts Commission, but the subject still fails WP:NARTISTS. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:WomenArtistUpdates I added a Seattle Times citation rating Jack Gunter's life-sized mural in the local theater as a Top-10 attraction in Snohomish County. This should pass the WP:NARTISTS qualification "The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument". PK-WIKI (talk) 03:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.