The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Simmons[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BASIC, WP:NPOL, or WP:NARTIST. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 03:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 03:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 03:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 03:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 03:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, she seems to pass WP:GNG and more importantly WP:BLP1E, while most coverage available is from her presidential run, such as this and this, among quite a few other sources, I was also able to find sources from well before her presidential run, such as this in The Seattle Times and this at GCU Today and this in The Chicago Tribune. I suggest that there's more from back when she was Miss Illinois, but what I found seems to be sufficient for notability purposes. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Passes WP:GNG as per sources available. Peneplavím (talk) 16:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sufficient sources available for notability.--Ipigott (talk) 12:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified in this discussion and already in the article that show she was already notable as a musical artist before her political candidacy. Coverage includes The Washington Post, Seattle Times, Chicago Tribune and others so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.