The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

James Carroll (Football/Soccer Player)[edit]

James Carroll (Football/Soccer Player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely non-notable 15-year-old. Plays in the "4th tier of the Victorian Football Structure", which is definitely not professional, so does not meet the sports notability guideline and has no significant coverage in reliable sources, so doesn't meet general notability guideline. Perhaps the kid will be notable one day, but he definitely isn't today. Jenks24 (talk) 02:34, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 02:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 02:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. I'd go so far as to say this is an A7 candidate: no credible claim of significance or importance. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmmm, you may be correct. I thought it was a borderline case so decided to bring it to AfD, but if you or another admin want to delete per A7 (or tag the page as A7 for another admin to review), I certainly wouldn't oppose it. Jenks24 (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, doesn't bother me either way. There's no harm in letting this run seven days and it's usually best to avoid A7s if there's any doubt. --Mkativerata (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - 15 year old kid, fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 20:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete premature article on youth footballer who is still a long way from notability at this stage. fails NFOOTBALL, no GNG coverage.--ClubOranje^T 11:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This kid is 15, and he doesn't even play at a national level of football. In fact, he plays at the FOURTH TIER of an Australian state league. – PeeJay 22:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Life^talk 00:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.