The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:16, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James Garvey (Louisiana politician)[edit]

James Garvey (Louisiana politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local school board member, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Coverage is hyper-local. Most sources are not independent of government. Mere mentions in relation to election campaign AusLondonder (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the sourcing is extremely poor unfortunately. Disclosure and election statements on government websites are not relevant. Sources about family members do not seem relevant either. AusLondonder (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rebuttal Guidelines say:People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. All of these criteria apply here. Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but with respect, are you serious? What sources? Government financial disclosure statements? Articles about his father? AusLondonder (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reply:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  17:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will get out of the way to make this easier for the closer. Carrite (talk) 18:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 00:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.