The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 16:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James M. Goslin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claim to fame is being sheriff of a parish (population 250k) in Louisiana. Does not meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG not enough significant WP:RS coverage, just obits and passing mentions of him in regards to police actions. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Fully sourced. Notable under "Local poltiicians" section. Billy Hathorn (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He appears to meet the GNG to me. 10 facts from 10 sources as good as 10 facts from 1 source. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 03:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Billy Hathorn and Richard Arthur Norton. I can't accept "just obits" as an argument for deletion, as some obituaries are written by journalists. James500 (talk) 07:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.