The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Lunghitano[edit]

Jamie Lunghitano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:ATHLETE. sources are only primary sources. could not find any reliable sources. nothing in gnews. nothing in major Australian search engine trove and nothing in major Australian news site [1]. he's only had 7 fights and none of these fights were top level events. LibStar (talk) 16:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 16:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 16:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The references are either invalid links or from the promotion company. He also seems to fail the notability criteria. His biggest claim to fame is an unsourced statement that he ranks in the top 5 Muay Thai middleweights in the state of Western Australia. Papaursa (talk) 03:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

even if he was in the top 5 in Western Australia that does not grant automatic notability. LibStar (talk) 14:19, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet any notability criteria. Being ranked in the top 5 of Western Australia does not meet notability criteria, even if true. Astudent0 (talk) 18:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable. Janggeom (talk) 16:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.