The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 16:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Kerdikoshvili[edit]

Janet Kerdikoshvili (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maybe won a local event. Everything else she was appointed to and lost. All sources are to non-RS fansites. Fails WP:NMODEL Legacypac (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's clear some things up. 'Casting call' and 'appointed' mean she did not win a title, but rather was selected in a closed process, just as other actors are selected. globalbeauties.com and the other pageant site listed are blogs - not WP:RS with a demonstrated history of fact checking or editorial oversight. Sourcing directly to the pageant business site is WP:PRIMARY and not considered the independent third part coverage required to establish notability. There is not enough evidence in the article to show she passes WP:MODEL, but if more can be provided please put it in. Merely participating in a pageant is not notable as found in dozens of recent AfDs. Generally most of these contestants have their WP:BLP1E and go on to their non-notable lives so absent a strongly sourced claim otherwise in the article it is safe to assume they belong on a list somewhere per WP:NOPAGE. Legacypac (talk) 04:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 20:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.