The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. When this article was nominated I was confused as to what it was about; article is much clearer after the rewrite and the subject seems to be notable. (non-admin closure) ~ satellizer ~~ talk ~ 23:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jangnama[edit]

Jangnama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is rather poorly written, and I'm not sure if it passes WP:GNG, although I admittedly have little knowledge about this subject. It has no references, thus fails WP:V, is probably mostly original research and is not written from a neutral point of view. ~ satellizer ~~ talk ~ 07:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.