The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to the forked article, now at Japanese migration to Colombia. Note that there is no distinct content to merge. bd2412 T 04:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese immigration to Colombia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be an accidental duplication of another page, Japanese Immigration in Colombia. Since that article doesn't have an "orphan" tag, I assume this is the one that should be deleted. Logophile59 (talk) 02:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 July 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Per WP:REDUNDANTFORK, such cases are resolved by merger not deletion. The nominated page has the better title per WP:NCCAPS. Andrew D. (talk) 07:28, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - As far as I can see, the two articles are identical in content, so a Merge is unnecessary and doesn't make much sense to recommend. This is, however, something that could have been solved by a uncontroversial Redirect rather than an AFD, so that's what should happen here. Rorshacma (talk) 15:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:A10. This was mainspaced on 10 June - diff. it is a duplicate of Japanese Immigration in Colombia which the article creator modified on 11 June - [1] - and which was originally at Japanese Colombians (which may be a better title). We don't need two identical articles, and there's little editing history worth saving - hence speedy delete per A10, and retaining Japanese Colombians (or presently Japanese Immigration in Colombia). Redirects can be created as needed (in/to/etc.) - but we don't need the article history here.Icewhiz (talk) 07:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Further to WP:NCCPT, Japanese immigration to Colombia (NB small 'i' for immigration, use of to as preposition) is a more grammatically correct title than Japanese Immigration in Colombia (incorrect use of capital I, incorrect preposition) but the most grammatically correct title would be "Japanese migration to Colombia".--Goldsztajn (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.