This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 January 10. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was speedy not-delete per WP:SNOW. It's obvious after one day of discussion that there will not be consensus to delete, so I'm closing the AfD early because it stands a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding and because it is an eyesore on a high-traffic page. Whether this should be redirected to the article about the event is an editorial judgment, to be worked out with the passage of time. It is inappropriate to use AfD to have that debate. -- Y not? 18:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Subject known only for one event per WP:BLP1E. KimChee (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on reopening I'm reopening this after a good faith but poorly judged "speedy keep". The article may well be kept, but there are diverse views here and the discussion is ongoing. There was also a merge decision elsewhere, so the result of the close was an edit war. Best to let this run its course, and keep all the discussion in one place. As I say, it may well be kept, but a proper process and unified discussion forum here are an advantage to avoiding disruption.--Scott Mac 09:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]