This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2015 January 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (Delete all) j⚛e decker ^talk 15:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Martinelli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concern was the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL as well as WP:NCOLLATH. PROD contested by the author the following reason: Article meets WP:NCOLLATH because he has won a notable college soccer award. Just because it's a college soccer award and not a college basketball/football award does not make it non-notable. The fact that it's a college soccer award has nothing to do with this. The reason is because it fails WP:NCOLLATH is because those awards are not national awards, those are awards within their respective conference. – Michael (talk) 04:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason: – Michael (talk) 04:48, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 04:48, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all – none of them, all of whom purportedly won local awards, meet COLLATH, which requires national awards. GNG is not met. C 679 05:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, as per above, fails, WP:NCOLLATH. -- Fauzan^{✆ talk} _{✉ email} 07:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep – Sorry to ruin your deletion spree, but these articles meet WP:NCOLLATH Quidster4040 (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't. WP:NCOLLATH is met if they won a national award. Which none of these guys have. So they all fail. – Michael (talk) 19:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be so anal about it Quidster4040 (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - none of them have played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning all these articles fail WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Additionally, none of them meet WP:COLLATH either. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Player has not played in fully professional league, nor played senior international football, so fails NFOOTY. Awards received not national so fails WP:NCOLLATH. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to achieve GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all They're all college soccer players who fail to meet WP:NCOLLATH. Conference honors are not the same as national awards.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.