The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jason Krueckl[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails the GNG as well as WP:NHOCKEY criteria. Professional hockey played exclusively in the low minors in Germany and the US. Ravenswing 00:53, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 01:07, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 01:07, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep – Notable for playing five seasons at the highest level of professional inline hockey. Dolovis (talk) 01:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- And, obviously you can show, via reliable sources, that playing five seasons of inline hockey at the highest level actually IS notable? Resolute 01:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - It's not even a matter of reliable sources. Inline hockey has no subordinate notability criteria, as part of NSPORTS, so no such assertion whatsoever can be supported, even for league MVPs or all-time leading scorers. Any importance deriving from inline hockey can only be supported through meeting the GNG. Ravenswing 08:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete Inline hockey itself is barely notable; Jason Krueckl certainly is not. DocumentError (talk) 03:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability/passes WP:GNG. Reso lute 01:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete Doesn't even remotely come close to being notable through passing GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 04:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete fails GNG. NHOCKEY doesn't apply. It is for ice hockey, not inline hockey. Is ball hockey next? Hwy43 (talk) 09:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete. I'm not sure what project inline hockey would fall under. Closest would be ice hockey, so I don't think playing in-line hockey for five years qualifies. Patken4 (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.