The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jayachandran P R[edit]

Jayachandran P R (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:ANYBIO. 57 citations does not meet #1. I am not sure that being part of a team that discovered a new crustacean is enough to show notability. There is no indepth coverage of this person to show they meet WP:GNG. Article is an autobiography. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.