The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Procedural close, as the nomination was a violation of Tristan noir's topic ban (see the AN thread). No prejudice against speedy renomination by other editors. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 09:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Woodward[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N and WP:RS The subject of the article, a contemporary poet, falls short of notability and the article itself offers no reliable sources. Tristan noir (talk) 04:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:18, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:18, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(comment): The subject of the article, a contemporary poet, falls short of notability and the article itself offers no reliable sources. Tristan noir (talk) 04:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The person is notable, the "British Haiku Society" an important member of the Haiku scene[1] have Woodward as one of the two award adjudicators, for its 2010 haibun award.[2] Yogesh Khandke (talk) 09:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.