The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to God complex. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jehovah complex[edit]

Jehovah complex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a duplicate of God Complex under a different name. AtlasDuane (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge This is not a duplicate of God complex (note the small 'c': God Complex is a different article). There's a lot of hits in Google Scholar and some point to this being a specific conceptualisation in Jungian psychoanalysis of the broader idea of a God complex. That said, both this and God complex are stubs, so probably better to merge this article into God complex (make it a subsection there), until such time as more content is added. Bondegezou (talk) 13:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comments. I take it you meant God complex and "God compelx" was just a mis-spelling. I see the article on God complex was nominated for deletion twice - once in 2005, once in 2009 - but both times, the result of the discussion was keep. Vorbee (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, that was a typo. Have fixed. Bondegezou (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unreferenced and fails verification. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've done a bit of work on the article and added two references. Bondegezou (talk) 10:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Having read ref#2 at [1] I'm not impressed. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:46, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• merge yes, it is a similar topic under a related name. This one is less commonly known--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to God complex. The only arguable difference between the two articles lies in the uncited second paragraph. Those that think this is a distinct topic need to cite that stuff. In the meantime merge what is cited and lose the rest with a redirect. SpinningSpark 04:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.