The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jenn Sterger

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:V or WP:RS for notability. delete UtherSRG (talk) 16:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Clearly notable per the following refs:

Also note that there are over 29K GImage hits and over 180K GHits. GregJackP (talk) 17:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - reasons stated by GregJackP, user UtherSRG demonstrates quickness to nominate articles for deletion without proper consideration. Perhaps mommy didn't love him enough. Eatmocake (talk) 17:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:V and W:RS per the links above. — MrDolomite • Talk 19:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Greg. Joal Beal (talk) 19:29, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Careless nomination, WP:BEFORE should be a requirement, to avoid nominations such as this. DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - absolutely no reason to delete. NorwalkJames (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this AfD is an over-reaction to a comment made in this other, unrelated AfD. This is clearly a careless and possibly bad faith nomination and should be snow closed. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.