The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This has been relisted twice with no comments for a week, and general consensus to keep exists. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 03:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Hepner[edit]

Jennifer Hepner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOPAGE this bio should be deleted and redirected to Miss Montana. The media coverage over her DUI seems disproportionate and inappropriate in a wiki article. Should an otherwise private person have a DUI forever associated with them on Wikipedia and all its mirrors? If she did not have an article we would never start one over the DUI. If you strip that out, you have just the basic fact she won the contest and a little trivia about her win that can be incorporated on a list. Legacypac (talk) 06:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 11:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 11:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a WP:GNG pass with, and I quote, "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If you think that the coverage of one aspect of the subject's life is disproportionate, then that is a editing issue, not a deletion issue. Ejgreen77 (talk) 03:10, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit out the DUI and you have the info at Miss Montana give and take a little detail. So the stand alone article tells the reader nothing the list does not tell them except that she (shockingly) went to University of Montana. The sources are really lacking here beyond the DUI. There is this though [1] Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The DUI is one reason we may want to editorially turn this one into a redirect. Montana is one of the least populated U.S. states.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the holder of Miss Montana has formal duties, and as can be seen from this article a formal platform. The DUI is notable since it created a vacancy in the position of Miss Montana. The article should be kept.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.