The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jermlaine[edit]

Dungeons & Dragons monster which has appeared in several supplements, as well as Dragon magazine, but which lacks in-game or real world significance, as well as third party sources. J Milburn (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as i was trying to add the AfD template! just a variation on a gremlin and non notable for anything within the game itself other than being just another creature. like Sirine it is just something renamed for the game with no special qualities. shadzar|Talk|contribs 21:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not every D&D creature is notable. Very few are, actually. This is no slaad or death knight, so away it goes. (I'm going to copy-paste this into all of the D&D creature AfD's going on right now. Couldn't we have combined them for ease?) --Ig8887 (talk) 03:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dis grot's not gonna live long. Squash 'em. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing)} 03:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — non-notable. Mention in a list. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Axl (talk) 15:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.