The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 16:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica grist[edit]

Jessica grist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Another procedural nomination. I've declined a ((prod)) on this (Despite minor involvement in many media activities the subject does not seem to have achieved true notability in any particular area. Google has little on her. The article is unreferenced and has a promotional tone.) as I think there is enough there to suggest potential notability and possibly warrant the article being cleaned up and sourced rather than deleted. All that said, I was genuinely surprised at how few hits a Google search turned up, as she does pass the "I've heard of her" test (and this is spectacularly not my field). Personally, although I'm bringing this to AfD to get a wider consensus, I think there is enough here that if it can be sourced, I vote to keep.  – iridescent 20:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unless adequate sources come to light before end of nomination. HeartofaDog (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete: I put the Prod on because I wasn't sure that any one thing that was being claimed provided sufficient notability for an article. There might be more notability than the article says but Google didn't provide it and I have not heard of her. This could be a case of somebody just on the brink of becoming notable but, as it stands, the article still feels like a delete to me. A few good references would make all the difference. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - needs massive cleanup and is promotional in tone, but these could be fixed. The fatal problem is the total lack of reliable sources. A google search for this person yields a great many facebooky and myspacey type things- enough to verify she exists- but no reliable secondary sources which we need to establish notability. Reyk _YO!

• Speedy delete lower case surname is prima facie evidence of non-notability Sceptre ^(talk) 01:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ah yes, Geogre's Law. Reyk _YO! 03:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.