The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - notability has been confirmed in this discussion. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Heritage Trail in Bialystok[edit]

Jewish Heritage Trail in Bialystok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article was deprodded, article has no insufficient of notability, it considering fails the notability requirements. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 01:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete it's an itinerary, not a marked trail. Abductive (talk) 01:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per the above remarks. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So you have to go to this city and check this trail because actually all sites and buildings are marked with special sign --Chlorofil (talk) 06:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About notability: there are three books about this trail, one was published in English--Chlorofil (talk) 06:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• If you can provide a link to the book it would be a great help. Abductive (talk) 06:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So here you have this book in English. More important publication with about 200 pages was published only in Polish.--Chlorofil (talk) 07:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC) This Polish publication titled "Historia, pamięć, tolerancja. Nauczanie o wielokulturowości i lokalnej historii" wasn't published in pdf yet.--Chlorofil (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• In light of this evidence and some of my own research, and avoiding biting the newbies I'm retracting my delete. The article needs cleanup and some time before an AfD. Abductive (talk) 07:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 15:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 15:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - obviously there are sources; don't delete something just because it needs a lot of cleanup.--Kotniski (talk) 16:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--sources now provided.--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True, but it is important to recognize that the sources available at the time of nomination were self-published and/or in Polish. My retraction is based on other considerations. Abductive (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just add photo with sign of this trail on one of the main buildings in city.--Chlorofil (talk) 12:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep sources are now sufficient. DGG (talk) 03:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.