The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim jersey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Prod, deprodded. Probably a CSD candidate.

This is a non notable football/soccer player. The references are to cat or dog articles, and other things about the article lead me to believe it's a hoax.

I find nothing on the google searches, and as I said, the references provided go to nothing that mentions the subject of the article.

If I'm somehow mistaken, please correct me. Shadowjams (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as blatant hoax. Drawn Some (talk) 09:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please try, but I doubt it'll happen. I've seen a number of obvious hoaxes denied for CSD recently. Shadowjams (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who read it carefully and even glanced at the references would see the hoax. It doesn't make a bit of sense. Drawn Some (talk) 10:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Ooops. Word has got out that we Wikipedians will spend hours if not days debating trivia. I read the article. There is no prospect of it being "improved". I did find this reference quite amusing, but also revealing. Johnuniq (talk) 11:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in investigating Simon Bjorn Ackwayus just above, it appears that an account was created for the sole purpose of nominating it for deletion to watch the fun. But that's not WP:AGF on my part, is it? Drawn Some (talk) 17:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. significant information is all hoax, other information, if true, is largely unverifiable and completely non notable. Hardly worth the effort to discuss. --ClubOranje^T 09:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.