The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 06:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rebuild, remove the list of firstnames for people, and replace with the see also section, since this should lead somewhere, and we have a mass of disambiguation pages where it could go. 65.95.14.34 (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wikipedia has many, many lists of people by first name, e.g. Adam (name), Zelda (given name). That's why there's a "given name" template. The article should have that template, as it's not really a dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*poke* 05:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - see no apparent reason not to have this list of Jimmies.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.