The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent consenus DGG ( talk ) 14:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Street[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with the apparent basis "it may meet notability" (although there's certainly no inherited notability and, I'll emphasize also, that there would still need to be the needed coverage) but I still confirm the PROD as there's still nothing actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 21:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Note that I deprodded the article using the rationale "Decline prod. May meet WP:CREATIVE per the subject's works and career" (diff), rather than per the erroneous quote as stated in the nomination atop. Please do not misquote Wikipedia users, which is misleading. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I read that as a reasonable comment, the article makes plausible claims to notability, the editor seemed to suggest that there might be sources to support those claims.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable writer, presenter and reader primarily tied to radio.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete looked for sources. I found recent news articles about the activities of a Jo Street who is a "Commissioning Executive" and producer for the BBC, but appears to be a different Jo Street.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Admin comment: @DGG: You just deleted this AfD page with the reason "apparent consensus". I've restored it because I assume you meant to close the discussion as delete, right? Sandstein 07:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.