The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Catheline[edit]

John Catheline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to meet notability guidelines and contains no references. Article also appears to be a self-promotion of a regional wrestler. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: While I managed to find one news item [1], I really don't think there's enough coverage to meet notability standards. Someone else's opinion might differ but that's mine. Pigman☿/talk 18:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 13:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Although I'll change this vote if someone can source some of the statements made, such as the stunt work in movies, and PWI 500 claim. RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 03:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.