The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 08:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Harding (lawyer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:BIO: the article does not show significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Sources are mostly self-published or press releases. Moreover, does not pass either WP:AUTHOR or WP:ACADEMIC. I also made a good faith effort to check Google News and could not find more. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The article is totally devoid of any indication of notability. TJRC (talk) 22:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not notable, per nom and TJRC. GregJackP Boomer! 02:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.